Wikipedia writing service wouldn’t surprise me if Wikipedia articles were marked for deletion by Wikipedia administrators. Wikipedia editors have been actively focused on removing content under the “Notability” guidelines for external references. A “quick delete” information box at the top of a Wikipedia article indicates that the article will be deleted from Wikipedia without discussion. Another information field may contain the message, “This article is being considered for deletion according to Wikipedia’s deletion policy.” You can (and should!) participate in discussions to keep such articles. Most of the participating users are power editors of Wikipedia and won’t join your page because they already chose 1st place when adding such an info box. But how do you know when the talk page “battle” is lost? Often it happens when only you (the author) and a powerful editor are involved in the discussion. Articles may need to be more technical to attract the attention of other users or more technical for others to participate in the debate. The outcome of such dialogue is rarely in your favor, so it’s time to prepare to save the article – once deleted, Wikipedia will erase the article entirely from all public records. It can be frustrating to lose a Wikipedia article. If you’ve exhausted all reasonable arguments for your article to remain on Wikipedia, you can still leave it in the public domain. Two possible approaches are described below.
The encyclopedia is a project led by Dr. Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger that presents valuable options for preserving vanishing Wikipedia articles. The project has made great technological strides this past year by creating several valuable resources. For example, you can use EncycloSearch to search various encyclopedias. EncycloReader allows you to search and view articles through a standard interface. It also publishes articles on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. In other words, a central authority (or even a central database) can only remove such articles. More importantly, anyone connected to this network can save a complete copy of the article on their PC. Many Wikipedia articles under the CC BY-SA 3.0 license are already “in circulation” on this network. The encyclopedia project is still in progress but can already be used to archive encyclopedia articles.
When you view an article, it is converted to a file format called ZWI (supported by the Knowledge Standard Foundation). Files containing articles enter the P2P network and are accessible to all peers connected to this network. Even after your article has been removed from Wikipedia, it will still be available on the Encyclosphere network (with wiki code and all images!).
Don’t forget that Wikipedia infoboxes with “delete” warnings become part of the circular. You can remove such boxes on Wikipedia and immediately view the article in EncycloReader. This will create well-formed HTML in the ZWI file without the Wikipedia message. Remember to put these boxes back in the Wikipedia article, as they cannot be deleted. In any case, note that such boxes are automatically added by the Wikipedia bot.
Another option for holding articles is to use a resource like Wikipedia writing service, which is similar to Wikipedia. For example, suppose your paper contains a topic covered in the Wiki encyclopedia (often the case), and you are a qualified registered user of Wikipedia. In that case, it will take him about 5 minutes to import the article into Wikipedia. It takes seconds.
Go to the article creation page and copy and paste the URL link to the Wikipedia article. This will be imported, fixing all internal links using Wiki’s internal articles and removing the Wikipedia “delete” box. If you want to import articles manually, use the conversion tool. This tool takes Wikipedia’s wiki code and converts it into professional Wikipedia editing services articles with no missing internal links. This approach has excellent features. Removes boxes inserted by Wikipedia administrators and automatically includes a source attribution message to the original Wikipedia article. In fact, the same approach works for “draft” articles (URLs with “draft:”). It is “more” robotic than Wikipedia. Because there aren’t many admins running intelligent algorithms to handle spam and “bad guys” and handle the content. On the other hand, it is more “inclusive” in terms of publication than Wikipedia, as it accepts articles with few external citations.
I hope these tips help you.
